Request to re-add option to disable SELinux - compromise

[Daniel J Walsh]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ralf Corsepius wrote:
| On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 11:58 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
|
|> One question nobody has been able to answer to my satisfaction yet: Why
|> would it be essential that SELinux can be disabled from the installer
|> vs. from the installed system?
| One point: Once SELinux had been active, it can cause problems, despite
| it had been disabled, afterwards:
| C.f.: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453365
|
| Ralf
|
|
This is a bug in code, and I am not sure this would not have happened if
SELinux was disabled in the first place.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkh0w7cACgkQrlYvE4MpobPVQACfeKeTPGdvykyNOdclQq/pdNUx
j+MAn2v0no1EusfF+VsvAOUyN7ZBH6OY
=lBlz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----