No answer to easy bug policy

[Toshio Kuratomi]

Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 10:59:24AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 02:04:47AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RahulSundaram/CollectiveMaintenance
>> I have hopefully adressed th ecomments, by stating that this is a policy
>> for bug fixes, not easy bug as such. Also added a 3 weeks delay before
>> the procedure is started, precise a bit what is a bug easy to fix and
>> put explicitely the cleaning of blocker bugs on the reporter.
> 
> Still on
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RahulSundaram/CollectiveMaintenance
> 
Instead of orphaning, what about adding comaintainers?  That makes for 
more responsibility on the part of the person who thinks that the bug is 
an easy fix to evaluate this in terms of correctness, the future effects 
of the patch, and what is going on upstream.

This would be separate from any other policy allowing people to fix 
EasyFix+evaluated correct bugs (like mschwendt's spec file cleanups.)

-Toshio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080714/109a2057/attachment.sig>