No answer to easy bug policy

Bill Nottingham notting at redhat.com
Mon Jul 14 16:35:29 UTC 2008


Patrice Dumas (pertusus at free.fr) said: 
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:48:35AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 17:42 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > > That's not what my experience is. Bug with fix not acted upon is almost
> > > always by people @ redhat. But I really don't want to start a flamewar
> > > about who are the good and the bad guys I want a policy for bug with
> > > fixes.
> > 
> > Whilst I do like that you're trying to solve this problem, I think one
> > big hole here is who decides that the "fix" is either easy, or right?
> 
> There is nothing about the fix being right. The criterion is having a
> fix. These 3 situation may qualify for a bug easy to fix:

Wait, you want to escalate sanctions (or whatever you'd like to call
them) without any knowledge of whether or not the fix is *right*?

Bill




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list