consolidating on gnupg2 in F10
John Poelstra
poelstra at redhat.com
Fri Jul 25 04:27:39 UTC 2008
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> For a really long time now, we've shipped both gnupg and gnupg2
> in Fedora. In fact, in Fedora 9 a relatively standard install will
> get both installed.
>
> This isn't ideal, obviously - we want as much to be using the same
> code, keystore, etc. as possible.
>
> Here's the current list of things that require gnupg 1:
>
> AcetoneISO2 spot
> apt athimm
> duplicity robert
> ketchup ben
> perl-GnuPG-Interface mdomsch
> perl-Module-Signature scop
> pgp-tools mdomsch
> psi abompard
> qca-gnupg abompard
> spamassassin wtogami
> zeroinstall-injector salimma
>
> It appears a good number of these can be ported to gnupg2, if not
> all of them. Should we wire up a feature page?
>
> Bill
>
I don't recall seeing a response to this. Are we targetting a feature page?
John
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list