No answer to easy bug policy
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Mon Jul 14 21:27:07 UTC 2008
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 13:42 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> What I'm asking is instead of:
>
> "If you don't answer after 2 weeks, a reminder should be sent, and if
> not answered within a further 2 weeks the package will be orphaned
> according to the policy stated at"
>
> We could have:
>
> "If you don't answer after 2 weeks, a reminder should be sent, and if
> not answered within a further 2 weeks My_Username will be assigned as a
> comaintainer and can make changes according to the policy stated at"
Instead of creating a bunch of different ways to "timeout" a maintainer
and "do something" after the fact, why can't we just fix up the
non-responsive policy? I'd rather have one policy than n+ for each
situation.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080714/e5c495a4/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list