Heads-up: brand new RPM version about to hit rawhide
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
Tue Jul 15 17:38:13 UTC 2008
Doug Ledford wrote:
>
>>> It's when dealing with
>>> this sort of thing that the whole exploded source method becomes *far*
>>> more important in terms of developer productivity. Right now, both the
>>> rhel4 and rhel5 kernel maintainers actually use exploded source because
>>> CVS was untenable. But, because the build system doesn't support
>>> exploded source, they have some convoluted scripts that spit out a
>>> tarball and patches from their git repo and check those into CVS solely
>>> for the purpose of building.
>> Is it feasible to do that in general to make current-style src rpms
>> available until you can replace them completely with something better
>> for both the build system and public source redistribution?
>
> Oh, I'm sure it could be done, yeah. It's very hackish though.
Backwards compatibility to simplify user's lives is sometimes worth a
hack. Isn't that what RHEL is all about - and for good reasons?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list