consolidating on gnupg2 in F10

[Rex Dieter]

Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Friday 18 July 2008 09:11:21 Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>> For a really long time now, we've shipped both gnupg and gnupg2
>>> in Fedora. In fact, in Fedora 9 a relatively standard install will
>>> get both installed.
>>> It appears a good number of these can be ported to gnupg2, if not
>>> all of them. Should we wire up a feature page?
>> Imo, yes, it's a worthy goal to get these ported so that at least gnupg(1)
>> doesn't land in any default install.
>>
>> fyi, here's my inquiry upstrem on whether it's possible or a good idea to
>> try dropping gnupg1:
>> http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2008-July/024485.html
>>
>> answer: probably not a good idea.
> 
> Why did you come to that conclusion? We don't support IDEA and Suse did 
> mention that they have switched to only GPG2. The only caution is around 
> gpg-agent.

based on Werner Koch's response:
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2008-July/024490.html

"You should don't remove gnupg-1 from a distribution..."

shrug, I'm ok either way.

-- Rex