Putting --fuzz=0 into rpmbuild on older versions?
Arjan van de Ven
arjan at infradead.org
Sun Jul 27 19:10:50 UTC 2008
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 18:53:33 +0000 (UTC)
Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at> wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl <at> redhat.com> writes:
> > So, sure enough, I got blindsided by the fact that rawhide's RPM now
> > applies patches with --fuzz=0. I don't object to tightening the
> > policy like that, but it's pretty unhappy-making that having tested
> > an SRPM on my Fedora 9 system offers no protection against the koji
> > build failing.
>
> For the KDE packages, we're simply adding %define _default_patch_fuzz
> 2 to our specfiles whenever a patch doesn't apply due to fuzz.
eww... why not rebase the patch instead?
(while making sure it's still a valid result)
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan at linux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list