Proposal: bugzilla component for pre-review package development

[Bastien Nocera]

On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 09:27 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "BN" == Bastien Nocera <bnocera at redhat.com> writes:
> 
> BN> Make the report less buggy and not show up reviews that have
> BN> non-resolved dependencies.
> 
> "less buggy" is certainly loaded language.  The report shows tickets
> in the "Package Review" component that have no 'fedora-review' flag
> set.  It does that.  I'm not sure how that behavior is somehow
> "buggy".
> 
> In any case, that's certainly something to look it, but it's also
> quite orthogonal, since it doesn't really cover the majority of the
> tickets I'm looking at.  Plus it's not really problematic to submit
> several interdependent review tickets.  I guess the report could
> filter out reviews that are dependent on non-"Package Review" tickets,
> but that still doesn't solve the main problem.
> 
> I'm kind of surprised there's reluctance to add a component since we
> add one for every single new package.  Surely they're not a scarce
> resource.

My point is that you could fix the report rather than change anything
about the workflow.