Let's make a plan for python3.0 in Fedora 10+

[Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams]

On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 22:58 +0200, Christoph Höger wrote:
> could you point out why exactly there is "something to do"?
> 
> I mean, python3000 is a new language and no replacement so if someone is
> willing to package it (or a package that depends on py3k) she/he should
> make sure its a python2.x compatible installation (especially in the
> naming of the package). That should be all, right?

Python 2.x *will* be discontinued at some time in the future. It may be
a few years, but it will happen.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com>

PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080602/332530e1/attachment.sig>