Networkmanager service is shutdown too early

[Dan Williams]

On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 14:01 +0200, Valent Turkovic wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Dan Williams <dcbw at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 09:36 +0200, Valent Turkovic wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Dan Williams <dcbw at redhat.com> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 13:19 +0200, Valent Turkovic wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:54 PM, Dan Williams <dcbw at redhat.com> wrote:
> >> >> > On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 19:37 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> >> >> >> On Wednesday, 04 June 2008 at 19:28, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> >> >> > On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 17:20 +0200, Valent Turkovic wrote:
> >> >> >> [...]
> >> >> >> > > Will this happen as an Fedora 9 update or just in rawhide (fedora 10) ?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Definitely in the next F9 update.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Will this update contain my patch which allows people to uninstall
> >> >> >> NetworkManager without losing pidgin and evolution (bug #351101)?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> You never gave a good reason why this bug has been left unfixed
> >> >> >> for over half a year, especially when the solution is trivial.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Can you try out
> >> >> >
> >> >> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=646433
> >> >> >
> >> >> > when it gets done?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks,
> >> >> > Dan
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Regards,
> >> >> >> R.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DominikMierzejewski
> >> >> >> Livna http://rpm.livna.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
> >> >> >> "Faith manages."
> >> >> >>         -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > fedora-devel-list mailing list
> >> >> > fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> >> >> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> I tested NetworkManager via:
> >> >> yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update NetworkManager
> >> >>
> >> >> as you suggested in bugreport but I still see the same bug present.
> >> >
> >> > What's the output of:
> >> >
> >> > ls -al /etc/rc3.d/*Net*
> >> >
> >> > Dan
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > fedora-devel-list mailing list
> >> > fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> >> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> ]# ls -al /etc/rc3.d/*Net*
> >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 2008-04-24 09:44
> >> /etc/rc3.d/S99NetworkManager -> ../init.d/NetworkManager
> >
> > Ok, so the even though NM and dbus have resetpriorities in their
> > specfile, it may be that HAL doesn't.  You'll want to do the following
> > as a workaround:
> >
> > chkconfig messagebus resetpriorities
> > chkconfig haldaemon resetpriorities
> > chkconfig NetworkManager resetpriorities
> >
> > and then messagebus should be at 22, NM at 27, and hal wherever.
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > --
> > fedora-devel-list mailing list
> > fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
> >
> 
> I did that and now NM is 27 and netfs is 25
> 
> # ls -al /etc/rc3.d/*Net*
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 2008-06-12 13:58
> /etc/rc3.d/S27NetworkManager -> ../init.d/NetworkManager
> 
> I'm at work and will report back when I come home because at home.

Bill, weren't we supposed to have netfs start after NM?  messagebus is
at 22, so maybe we should bump HAL to 23 and NM to 24 or something?  I
honestly forget where all the stupid priorities need to be.  All hail
our new upstart overloads in F10.

Dan