RFC: Page size on PPC/PPC64 builders

[David Woodhouse]

On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 10:17 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 12:30 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > Yes, there should. For _all_ architectures, not just secondary
> > architectures. (In fact, the whole distinction between primary and
> > secondary architectures is IMHO a bad idea and should be dropped).
> 
> David, you keep saying this, and its rather unproductive and insulting.
> Please, take the needle off your broken record.

No. It was relevant in the context; Tom was talking about facilities
which should be available for Fedora on secondary architectures when he
should have been including _all_ architectures.

Yet again, the artificial and ill-defined distinction was confusing.

-- 
dwmw2