system-config-network & Zeroconf
Arthur Pemberton
pemboa at gmail.com
Wed Mar 5 21:25:38 UTC 2008
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Dan Williams <dcbw at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Well, eventually the connection editor could potentially replace the GUI
> > functionality of s-c-n and ifup/ifdown could be pointed at NM, but we're
> > not there yet. There's a few more device types that NM would need to
> > support (mainly PPPoE/PPPoATM connections, good ISDN, etc) before we
> > could think about replacing anything. They are going to be parallel but
> > mutually exclusive for the time being. Also there will be some people
> > who won't ever want to use NM for some setups even though NM could work
> > for them; but that's fine.
>
> Are those people...looking at using zeroconf. I get the reasoning for
> avoiding NM in a more controlled networking situation... but zeroconf
> seems like NM's bread and butter to me... but what the hell do i know.
>
> -jef
How about static IPs and multiple concurrent networks? I couldn't get
either to work with network manager in F8
--
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list