system-config-network & Zeroconf

Sunil Ghai sunilkrghai at gmail.com
Wed Mar 5 23:05:54 UTC 2008


On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Lennart Poettering <mzerqung at 0pointer.de>
wrote:

>
> I haven't been following NM development lately. Just wondering: is
> there an option to explicitly select IPV4LL for configuring an IP
> address, instead of relying on dhcp-with-ipv4ll-fallback?
>
> Lennart
>
> --
> Lennart Poettering                        Red Hat, Inc.
> lennart [at] poettering [dot] net         ICQ# 11060553
> http://0pointer.net/lennart/           GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>


I think that is what actually Ubuntu people have, and I took it wrong
because for DHCP and static IP addresses separate options are there. Rather
than DHCP with IPv4LL fall back they search for devices capable with IPv4LL
directly. Now it makes sense.

-- 
Sunil Ghai
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080305/88cce7f6/attachment.htm>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list