broken deps at beginning of rawhide report?

[Andrew Farris]

Alex Lancaster wrote:
>>>>>> "JK" == Jesse Keating  writes:
> 
> JK> On Sun, 2008-03-02 at 03:53 -0700, Alex Lancaster wrote:
>>> I wonder if the formatting of the rawhide reports could be altered
>>> slightly to show the broken deps *first* before the list of new and
>>> updated packages?  This way the current state of the brokenness (or
>>> otherwise) of rawhide is more obvious to all maintainers, currently
>>> you have to scroll to the end of the report to see it.
> 
> JK> Since I had to do the mail by hand today, I re-ordered it like you
> JK> suggested, so that we could get more feedback on it.
> 
> Thanks, but it seems that the report was re-ordered for a couple of
> days, but it has now reverted back to the broken deps being at the
> end.
> 
> All the feedback on this list was positive about the change (and
> indeed seems to have raised the general level of awareness of broken
> deps as evidenced by the followup posts about broken deps), so I'm
> wondering why it was reverted?

I would imagine it was never changed in code yet, so not reverted either.

-- 
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul at gmail.com> www.lordmorgul.net
  gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3
No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
----                                                                       ----