F8 kernel-2.6.24.3-12.fc8
Trond Danielsen
trond.danielsen at gmail.com
Mon Mar 10 07:58:49 UTC 2008
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Andrew Farris <lordmorgul at gmail.com> wrote:
> Benjamin Kreuter wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 March 2008 19:29:23 Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> >> Sorry, we had to release with known bugs. A new kernel will be in
> >> updates-testing very shortly.
> >
> > Why did you have to release with known bugs? Why not just wait until the bugs
> > are fixed? The last three kernel updates broke suspend for me...
>
> Then why are you installing them? If this kernel was known to break things,
> then when it hits updates don't install it... not rocket science.
When the yum update applet reports that new updates are available, I
always choose to accept them without checking in advance whether or
not they will render my computer unusable.
Also if I did decide to check if the update would break my system, it
currently is not possible to tell pup to ignore this particular
update.
A try-catch mechanism could provide a fallback solution to kernels.
Kernels could be marked as bootable, not_checked and non_bootable, and
grub could check this flag/status file and switch to the first
bootable kernel if the default is marked as non_bootable. Perhaps a
feature like this is already available in grub?
--
Trond Danielsen
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list