few ideas how to make fedora better as a desktop

Shawn Starr sstarr at platform.com
Thu Mar 27 21:20:49 UTC 2008


Well, in that case any of those .static symlinks should be properly built static in their respective .spec/RPMs they reside from. Maybe another item for the Sbin project?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-devel-list-bounces at redhat.com
> [mailto:fedora-devel-list-bounces at redhat.com]On Behalf Of 
> Benny Amorsen
> Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 5:07 PM
> To: fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> Subject: Re: few ideas how to make fedora better as a desktop
> 
> 
> "Shawn Starr" <sstarr at platform.com> writes:
> 
> Top posting kills kittens.
> 
> > Well, if you did a ldd on a unix box you'd notice binaries 
> in /sbin were staticly built. 
> 
> Depends how you define Unix then. I don't have any actual Unix
> certified OS's around, but Fedora certainly doesn't link everything in
> /sbin statically.
> 
> My favourite:
> 
> $ ldd /sbin/dump.static 
>         linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0x00110000)
>         libext2fs.so.2 => /lib/libext2fs.so.2 (0x00ca6000)
>         libcom_err.so.2 => /lib/libcom_err.so.2 (0x00d0d000)
>         libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0x0058e000)
>         libbz2.so.1 => /lib/libbz2.so.1 (0x00cfa000)
>         libblkid.so.1 => /lib/libblkid.so.1 (0x00c66000)
>         libuuid.so.1 => /lib/libuuid.so.1 (0x00c8a000)
>         libdevmapper.so.1.02 => /lib/libdevmapper.so.1.02 (0x0060e000)
>         libselinux.so.1 => /lib/libselinux.so.1 (0x00336000)
>         libsepol.so.1 => /lib/libsepol.so.1 (0x00765000)
>         libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x003e6000)
>         libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x0056c000)
>         /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x003c7000)
> 
> (Yes that's cheating, /sbin/dump.static is a symlink. But still
> funny.)
> 
> 
> /Benny
> 
> 
> -- 
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
> 




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list