rawhide report: 20080307 changes
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Mon Mar 10 02:38:04 UTC 2008
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 17:45 -0600, Colorado Rob wrote:
> That seems a bit presumptuous:
>
> rpm -q totem-nautilus-xine
> package totem-nautilus-xine is not installed
>
> rpm -qa | grep totem
> totem-nautilus-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64
> totem-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64
> totem-pl-parser-2.21.92-1.fc9.x86_64
> totem-mozplugin-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64
>
> These are all rawhide packages.
>
> rpm -q --whatrequires totem
> totem-nautilus-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64
>
> rpm -q --whatrequires totem-nautilus-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64
> no package requires totem-nautilus-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64
>
> I'm certainly happy to entertain suggestions and delve deeper into this.
> But let's not jump to any conclusions before all the facts are in.
Eh, I was close. It's totem-nautilus for you. You have it installed.
It requires the version of totem you have installed. However there is a
new totem available as an update, and that new totem doesn't have a
totem-nautilus subpackage. So yum tries to upgrade totem, and in the
process finds a broken dep on the installed totem-nautilus. Since
totem-nautilus doesn't exist in rawhide anymore, the rawhide report
doesn't find a dep problem.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080309/003b8e56/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list