default partition scheme without /home - why ?
Valent Turkovic
valent.turkovic at gmail.com
Mon Mar 10 13:19:44 UTC 2008
2008/3/10 Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com>:
> On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 13:34 +0100, Valent Turkovic wrote:
> > Is that on purpose and if it why?
>
> Guessing how much space you'll need in your non /home partitions over
> time is difficult. Only you know how your install will be used. That's
> why the installer defaults to the easiest thing to guess; How much boot
> space you'll need, and how much swap space. However since you know how
> your install is going to be used, you are best to make those estimations
> and setup your /home as you want it.
>
> --
> Jesse Keating
> Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Fedora Live CD target audience are desktop users, right? I as a
desktop user haven't seen any need for / partiton over 8-10 GB.
Servers, and other fedora usages may need some other partition schemes
but a default home user has huge benefits from a dedicated /home
partition.
It is probable that new users aren't aware that /home partition as a
dedicated partition has advantages and it would be best if anaconda
makes the "smart" partition scheme in which /home is a separate
partition in LVM volume, or a logical partition. Separate home has
lots of advantages that you are aware of, so why not just change the
partition scheme to take advantage of that?
Cheers,
Valent.
.
--
http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/
linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless
registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org.
ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list