F8 kernel-2.6.24.3-12.fc8

Till Maas opensource at till.name
Tue Mar 11 10:01:47 UTC 2008


On Mon March 10 2008, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 02:50:15PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > On 03/10/2008 02:36 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 14:15 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > >> People should file bugs instead of just posting a comment in Bodhi.
> > >> Bodhi does not provide the same features as bugzilla for tracking
> > >> problems -- for example this weekend we had one person in Bodhi
> > >> posting the same -1 karma message three times in a row...
> > >
> > > Why not both?  Reference the bug in a karma posting.
> >
> > Negative karma postings should require a bug number...
>
> Absolutely. We shouldn't be using Bohdi to track bugs against updates -
> they should all be in BZ. And if we're going to allow -ve karma to revert a
> bug fix, then it must be accompanied by a bug report indicating what's
> wrong.

Imho it should be possible to portion out bad karma via Bugzilla, i.e. 
indicating in a bug report, that the bug is caused by an update for the 
regarding package. I find it very annoying to use bodhi after I filed a bug 
report and also to have to report it for every release seperately in bodhi, 
e.g. when I found a bug in a package for F8 and the same version was also 
released as an update for F7.

And also when it is possible to provide a bugzilla for a comment in bodhi, 
this comment should also be posted to bugzilla to the regarding bug report 
imho.

Regards,
Till

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080311/f8b0ea02/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list