f8 kernel 2.6.24.3-12 replacement?

[Andrew Farris]

Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:02:21 -0800
> "Jeff Spaleta" <jspaleta at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>  That was the new one that went to updates-testing yesterday.
>>>
>>>  The people whose bugs got fixed were outvoted.
>>
>> Whoa....it got unpushed in like a day?  I thought it was suppose to be
>> given a week and then be unpushed.
>> If its just trigger an unpush from testing as soon as karma trips the
>> negative value....without a grace period for more reports to come
>> in..that's a problem.
> 
> *Handwave*
> 
> I have a todo to write up a generic proposal for this issue.  Look for
> something tomorrow.

Cool.  I would think a package in updates-testing should stay there quite a long 
time even with neg-karma adding up, but should just never make it out of testing 
to stable.  Those testing should be able to handle backing out a package that 
disrupts their machines, and just not updating it again.

-- 
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul at gmail.com> www.lordmorgul.net
  gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3
No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
----                                                                       ----