is xorg.conf still needed
Bruno Wolff III
bruno at wolff.to
Thu May 1 21:06:35 UTC 2008
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 09:53:43 -0400,
Adam Jackson <ajackson at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> There's a detail here for outputs, which is that we don't always do
> sensible things if we try to start X with no monitor attached, and for
> some KVMs it's tough to tell the difference between not attached and
> merely not active. That's just a bug though.
Or even when the code knows a monitor is attached, but it doesn't do EDID.
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list