Summary of the 2008-04-08 Packaging Committee meeting
Jerry James
loganjerry at gmail.com
Mon May 12 22:05:53 UTC 2008
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Colin Walters <walters at verbum.org> wrote:
> Well, largely our "core" stack (and by this I mean comps) does not
> (yet) have dependencies on many Java libraries. So there's not a big
> deal swapping out say our objectweb-asm for JPackage's.
>
> However, this is most definitely not a sustainable system in the long term.
>
> I sort of view JPackage as just a specific instance of the
> cross-distribution collaboration problem. Most distributions tend to
> focus primarily on dependencies driven by desktop apps or their own
> internal needs, but the general free software world is far larger than
> that, even before OpenJDK opened up a lot of Java software to us.
So there are a bunch of Java packages that I use that I would like to
drive into *some* repository where they can get picked up and used by
others with similar needs. I've been driving towards Fedora so far.
What's a good long-term solution, then? Should I keep that up, focus
on JPackage, help figure out how the two are going to cooperate, ...?
--
Jerry James
http://loganjerry.googlepages.com/
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list