Xorg 1.5 missed the train?

[Todd Zullinger]

Christopher Stone wrote:
> Why the H.E. double hockey sticks do people think proving
> compatibility packages for nVidia users will somehow hold the
> desktop hostage for everyone else?
> 
> I do not understand why ajax could not provide compatibility rpms
> for nVidia users?  Is he not paid by redhat?  I mean just how
> difficult can it be to provide F8 xorg rpms on F9 for nVidia users??

I wouldn't be surprised if ajax came after you with a few hockey
sticks for suggesting that he do all that extra work just to support
some binary drivers. :)

Use F-8 for a while longer if you really must have nvidia drivers.

-- 
Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nothing is wrong with California that a rise in the ocean level
wouldn't cure.
    -- Ross MacDonald (1915-1983)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 542 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080520/d1135cac/attachment.sig>