package reviews: show only review reqs using a particluar language ?

[Andrew Farris]

Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue May 27 2008, Andrew Farris wrote:
>> Till Maas wrote:
> 
>>> Also it can be easily seen on a bug search results page. Maybe it could
>>> be agreed on a special way to mention it in case it is not already
>>> obvious, e.g. add the language in parenthesis after the package name,
>>> e.g.
>>>
>>> Review Request: foobarmatic (ruby) - some foo for bar
>> But language as a freeform random part of summary is not very clear either.
> 
> I did not suggest a freeform random part but a defined part of the subject, 
> e.g. in parentheses.
> 
>> Review Request: foobarmatic c - some foo for C++ code documentation parsing
>> Review Request: foobarmatic written in c++ - makes ruby colored slippers
>> Review Request: foobarmatic perl - pythons on a plane
> 
> Review Request: foobarmatic (c) - some foo for C++ code documentation parsing
> Review Request: foobarmatic (c++) - makes ruby colored slippers
> Review Request: foobarmatic (perl) - pythons on a plane

Nevertheless getting everyone to conform to something that arbitrary is more 
difficult than tagging a tracker bug.

-- 
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul at gmail.com> www.lordmorgul.net
  gpg 0x8300BF29 fingerprint 071D FFE0 4CBC 13FC 7DEB  5BD5 5F89 8E1B 8300 BF29