Suggestion with respect to the Fedora Update System

Till Maas opensource at till.name
Thu May 29 09:55:16 UTC 2008


On Thu May 29 2008, "G" wrote:

> If you take the enhancement mentioned in the mail , i dont have any
> clue on how to proceed and that makes it difficult. Probably a note
> atleast on what to be tested could obviously make a difference and
> that atlteast should be mandatory i feel.

Often it will be enough just to use the application a little to provide 
feedback, e.g. as long as the application does not crash or corrupt some 
data, then the update is good enough most of the times imho.

Regards,
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080529/365eb37f/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list