Fedora x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-05-27

Paul Howarth paul at city-fan.org
Sat May 31 13:57:10 UTC 2008


On Sat, 31 May 2008 07:24:22 -0500
Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch at dell.com> wrote:

> Fedora Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for x86_64
> based on rawhide as of 5-27-2008 (it takes a few days to build 5700
> packages twice).
> 
> There is a proposal before FESCo to remove packages that Fail To Build
> >From Source (FTBFS)[1] from the distribution, if the package owner
> >has
> no bug comments indicating it will be fixed in a reasonable amount of
> time before the next major release.  This would take place immediately
> following the Alpha release[2].  Please comment on the thread on
> fedora-devel-list[3], or come to the FESCo meeting next Thursday[4],
> if you have concerns.
> 
> 
> [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS
> [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Schedule (shows F9 presently,
>                                             extrapolate for F10)
> [3]
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-May/msg02369.html
> [4]
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Development/SteeringCommittee/Meetings
> 
> 
> Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
> 
> Total packages: 5722
> Number failed to build: 378
> Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 35
> Leaving:  343
> (there may be some duplicates if rawhide has 2 versions of a package)

...

> With bugs filed: 151
> ----------------------------------

...

> dledford lat-1.2.3-3.fc9 ['241911 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) pghmcfc

Bug #241911 is the ppc64 excludearch tracker bug for lat, not a FTBFS
bug. The package currently fails to build in Rawhide due to broken deps
in the mono stack that it buildreqs.

Paul.




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list