is xorg.conf still needed

[Callum Lerwick]

On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 19:29 -0800, dwight at supercomputer.org wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 April 2008 01:13:27 am Matej Cepl wrote:
> 
> > The whole truth is that we are on the way towards Stateless Linux
> > (which means here xorg.conf-less X), but we are not there yet. To
> > be honest, the way is long and the question is whether we will
> > arrive at Fedora 10 or later. 
> > ...
> 
> Are we really? Upon what do you base that statement? I'd be very 
> interested in knowing more, because the Stateless Linux mailing list 
> looks rather inactive. Is there a roadmap? And what's the current 
> status?

We're on our way to the Online Desktop, in which the operating system
itself starts to barely matter at all. (Which should draw people to
Linux since its cheap and reliable, right? :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080501/36f027d3/attachment.sig>