is xorg.conf still needed

[Arthur Pemberton]

2008/5/1 Callum Lerwick <seg at haxxed.com>:
> On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 19:29 -0800, dwight at supercomputer.org wrote:
>  > On Wednesday 30 April 2008 01:13:27 am Matej Cepl wrote:
>  >
>  > > The whole truth is that we are on the way towards Stateless Linux
>  > > (which means here xorg.conf-less X), but we are not there yet. To
>  > > be honest, the way is long and the question is whether we will
>  > > arrive at Fedora 10 or later.
>  > > ...
>  >
>  > Are we really? Upon what do you base that statement? I'd be very
>  > interested in knowing more, because the Stateless Linux mailing list
>  > looks rather inactive. Is there a roadmap? And what's the current
>  > status?
>
>  We're on our way to the Online Desktop, in which the operating system
>  itself starts to barely matter at all. (Which should draw people to
>  Linux since its cheap and reliable, right? :)

Do not believe that this is true at all. But ok. All that will mean is
that every one will be using Windows Live, and there will be even less
of a market for Linux... I guess that's all off-topic however.

-- 
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )