Xorg 1.5 missed the train?

[Les Mikesell]

Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> said:
>> That has nothing to do with what I said.  I'm suggesting that fedora 
>> should ship with interfaces that are publicized as standard, and allow 
>> time for changes in this standard to propagate before shipping something 
>> different from the standard.
> 
> The Fedora and X developers did publicize the change several months ago.
> The X.org code has been available for testing, and Fedora has had
> several test releases with the code integrated.

I thought someone said it was only a week or so ago that the ABI was 
even internally/informally pronounced as stable.

> 
> What more do you expect?  Do they have to take out an ad in the New York
> Times or send certified snail mail to nVidia?

Just naming it 1.5 would probably have been sufficient per the nVidia 
forum posting about targeting the release.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell at gmail.com