Xorg 1.5 missed the train?

[Paul W. Frields]

On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 14:09 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 20:03 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > Le Mer 21 mai 2008 19:32, Les Mikesell a écrit :
> > 
> > > I don't have a problem with Xorg taking any amount of time they want.
> > > The problem is in fedora shipping a pre-release - or perhaps even more
> > > so in their claim of knowing that the ABI is finalized before it is in
> > > fact published as a standard.
> > 
> > I suggest you complain to the xorg 1.5 release engineer the Fedora
> > xorg maintainer is not coordinating with him closely. And then that
> > you follow the advice of the xorg 1.5 release engineer on this issue.
> 
> You know I'm both, right?

And a superhumanly good job you've done for this release twice over, for
that matter.

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080522/21cb3229/attachment.sig>