review-o-matic : Fedora package review helper

[Toshio Kuratomi]

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Saturday, 01 November 2008 at 08:27, Kushal Das wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Tim Lauridsen
>> <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>>> I the ideal tool for this purpose IHO, would be some kind of web
>>> application, to handle all the workflow around getting packages into Fedora.
>>> * uploading specs and srpms
>>> * do automatic tests based on packaging guidelines.
>>> * a reviewer multiple choice popquiz to go through all the checks in review
>>> guidelines. showing the result of the automatic test for the each rules.
>> This is going to be a web application only. Current code is for PoC.
> 
> Bleh. What about offline checking? Or at least, will this web application
> work with lynx/links?
> 
Also, do we trust mock with unaudited spec files?  I know that we do
trust it with unaudited tarballs but I don't know if this is a reason to
open things up further.

-Toshio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20081101/8d83d960/attachment.sig>