Flash 10 in 64-bit F9: does it work?

[Jos Vos]

On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 02:02:03PM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:

> Flash 10 no longer needs libflashsupport. In fact, the Flash 10 RPM 
> already has a Require: libcurl.so.4. You couldn't install it without it. 

The Adobe RPM does not require libcurl.so.4:

$ rpm -qp --requires flash-plugin-10.0.12.36-release.i386.rpm
/bin/bash  
/bin/sh  
/bin/sh  
/bin/sh  
/bin/sh  
glibc >= 2.4
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1

But I'll try it without libflashsupport...

> If you somehow didn't have curl already installed... I question how you 
> installed Flash in the first place. It definitely wasn't by RPM or else 
> you added a --nodeps to your install arguments.

I did not use the Adobe RPM, but I am using my own RPM.  Given the above,
I don't see how installing the Adobe RPM would pull in libcurl.i386.

-- 
--    Jos Vos <jos at xos.nl>
--    X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV   |   Phone: +31 20 6938364
--    Amsterdam, The Netherlands        |     Fax: +31 20 6948204