starting Fedora Server SIG
Bill Nottingham
notting at redhat.com
Wed Nov 12 17:08:05 UTC 2008
Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net) said:
> > and it is less right, X is brought in, and also qt qt-X11. Should
> > certainly be investigated.
>
> That's probably because of LSB compliance. As has been discussed
> previously, someone needs to split the lsb package in server-side
> stuff and other stuff (yes that would mean a system that used only the
> first part would not be fully lsb compliant)
Alternatively... make it optional? Is LSB conformance required
for a minimal install?
Bill
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list