Broken dependencies in Fedora 9 - 2008-11-14
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Fri Nov 14 21:54:56 UTC 2008
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 16:44 -0500, David Huff wrote:
> either way, it was my understanding that both ExclusinveArch and
> ExcludeArch would work, ie the compose tools will check the srpm and not
> include the package in a tree if specified in either of these feilds.
That is correct.
> Im not sure if switching form ExclusinveArch to ExcludeArch will fix the
> issue at had.
>
> Any comments, as I would like to run a new build to try and resolve this
> issue.
Er, what exactly is the issue at hand?
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20081114/fc7c868c/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list