Proposal - "Slow updates" repo

Jochen Schmitt Jochen at herr-schmitt.de
Tue Nov 18 18:58:21 UTC 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Casey Dahlin schrieb:
> There's been a lot of talk about a stable release lately. Most agree
> that its not what Fedora does best and not something that would be
> natural for us to do. I have a sort of middle-ground proposal that
> might be easy enough to implement that we could try it out.
I see the following issue:

If a maintainer publish a security update, which depends of one of the
package which are in the 'slow updates' repository, how do you want to
handle this case?

Best Regards:

Jochen Schmitt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkkjECgACgkQT2AHK6txfgylDwCgugxmoct+pW6KQA002R2Hpt2q
Y/sAoMlMYSAreaaw4X6NLtTJXIDc2Woj
=AdjS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list