RFC: fix summary text for lots of packages

Patrice Dumas pertusus at free.fr
Fri Nov 21 16:26:38 UTC 2008


On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 05:13:33PM +0100, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> 2008/11/21 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com>:
> > I think that point is irrelevant as RPM Fusion follows the same
> > packaging guidelines as Fedora with a few legislation- and
> > license-related exceptions.
> 
> I perfectly know that RPM Fusion follows almost the same guidelines. I
> was just pointing out that some of the package Richard was talking
> about are not in Fedora.
> 
> And, as a matter of fact, I don't see a guideline that forbids what
> this thread is discussing.

No guideline doesn't mean that things cannot be improved. The fact that
it is not mandatory doesn't make it less important.

--
Pat




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list