Detecting binaries in rpmbuild
Nicolas Mailhot
nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Thu Nov 6 23:04:48 UTC 2008
Le jeudi 06 novembre 2008 à 23:22 +0100, Till Maas a écrit :
> On Thu November 6 2008, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>
> > Not really, IIRC. It just checks permissions of packaged files, and some
> > source files in tarballs often propagate to -debuginfo packages with
> > those "strange" permissions intact, and /that/ is something it'll warn
> > about.
>
> What a coincidence, I noticed this today, too. But I would consider this to be
> a bug in rpmbuild, because the permissions of the files for the -debuginfo
> package should be sanitized.
Really, that's our own fault for not making %defattr(644,root,root,755)
the default and not forcing packagers to actually check what files need
special permissions in each package.
--
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20081107/62c07b37/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list