libgnomecanvas owns %{_libdir}/libglade

Paul Howarth paul at city-fan.org
Fri Nov 7 14:19:02 UTC 2008


On Fri, 07 Nov 2008 22:15:07 +0900
Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> wrote:

> Paul Howarth wrote, at 11/07/2008 10:11 PM +9:00:
> >>> My main objective is to know whether a package that is going to
> >>> put a symlink in %{_libdir}/libglade/2.0/ would need to have
> >>> 'Requires: libgnomecanvas' because, if not anything, it looks a
> >>> bit odd to me since it looks related to libglade.
> >> libgnomecanvas has the dependency on libglade-2.0.so.0,
> >> libgnomecanvas.src has "BuildRequires: libglade2-devel", so
> >> I guess %_libdir/libglade{,/2.0} must be owned by libglade2. not
> >> by libgnomecanvas.
> > 
> > You might expect so, but it's not the case:
> > 
> > $ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libglade/{,2.0/}
> > libgnomecanvas-2.20.1.1-2.fc9.x86_64
> > libgnomecanvas-2.20.1.1-2.fc9.x86_64
> 
> 
> So what I am saying is that this is a bug in both libglade2
> and libgnomecanvas.
> 
> c.f some similar example:
>     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469491

Yes, I agree.

Paul.




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list