Concerns about 'provenpackager' and why I didn't mass ACL open

Sat Nov 8 19:14:14 UTC 2008

Michael Schwendt wrote:

> provenpackager (is that the final acl group name?)

Yes as in "I'm not going to willingly change this again".

If we need another level of packager power, then there will of course be
another group to go along with that.

-Toshio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20081108/47469a8b/attachment.sig>