Rubygems >= 1.3.0 for Merb

[Jesse Hutton]

Thanks, I filed a bug:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470688

On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> wrote:

> On Saturday 08 November 2008 12:52:30 pm Jesse Hutton wrote:
> > Merb 1.0 was just released yesterday and it requires Rubygems >= 3.0.
> >
> > I have very little experience messing with spec files, but I tried
> > modifying rubygems-1.2.0-2.fc10.src.rpm to build the 1.3.1 tgz. I adapted
> > the noarch patch to rubygems-1.3.1, but ran into some difficulty building
> > the rpm. The patch applied fine, but the install files seemed to be in
> > different directories than what was expected in the spec file (the gem
> > binary was in /bin and ubygems.rb, rubygems.rb, rubygems, and rubyconfig
> > also were in paths without a '/usr' prefix). After adjusting
> rubygems.spec
> > to find the files in the right directories, it built and installed. But,
> > perhaps unsurprisingly, stuff was in the wrong directory, eg gem was in
> > /bin, etc.
> >
> > I am running Rawhide (up to date as of today, 11/8) on x86_64, so the
> > noarch patch does affect where gems end up on my system. Does anyone know
> > how to build rubygems-1.3.1 correctly into an rpm? Or will 1.3.1 be
> making
> > it's way into F10 in the near future?
> >
> > Jesse
>
> David Lutterkort (dlutter BOGUS AT redhat DOT com (remove the BOGUS)) is
> the
> maintainer for rubygems; if you need a newer version you should file a bug
> against rubygems.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org>
>
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20081108/62f0068b/attachment.htm>