Flash 10 in 64-bit F9: does it work?
Jos Vos
jos at xos.nl
Sun Nov 9 20:08:00 UTC 2008
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 01:49:45PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Would it make sense for libflashsupport to "Require: libcurl.so.4" then?
> It is a hack, but libflashsupport in general is a hack, so it would seem
> to be the best place for this (since the flash-plugin RPM itself is not
> requiring the needed dependencies).
In that case you may want to add libz.so.1 too, as I also needed to
install zlib.i386 IIRC. But in that case you still have to know
that you have to install libflashsupport.i386 ;-).
I am used to built my own flash RPM for internal use, so I already
added this to my spec file.
--
-- Jos Vos <jos at xos.nl>
-- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364
-- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list