starting Fedora Server SIG

[Jesse Keating]

On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 17:46 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> What does that mean for distributions that don't use RPM?

rpm is part of lsb requirements is it not?

> 
> >> If it does, I don't see much advantage over having to build in every  
> >> distribution,version environment in the first place.  And if not, then  
> >> how is it supposed to know about the dependencies you mentioned.
> > 
> > The LSB specifies an lsb_release program that you can use to determine
> > how LSB compliant the box is :
> > 
> > [manu at orient ~]$ /usr/bin/lsb_release
> > LSB Version:  :core-3.1-ia32:core-3.1-noarch:graphics-3.1-ia32:graphics-3.1-noarch
> 
> Gak.. something that specifies locations by purpose wants an information 
> file in /usr/bin?

it's not a text file, it's an application that will check your level of
lsb.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20081112/6aaf45e9/attachment.sig>