starting Fedora Server SIG
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
Fri Nov 14 13:55:29 UTC 2008
Colin Walters wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Seth Vidal <skvidal at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>> It uses ANY memory. That's more than is reasonable considering that the
>> former solution (ifconfig) uses none.
>
> NM and ifconfig are not comparable. Now I think saying that NM
> shouldn't use very much in the way of resources in the static routing
> case is a reasonable request; certainly with the push for
> virtualization and running lots of OS instances it makes sense. But
> it's just not reasonable to say "ANY" memory; that's not a reasonable
> constraint to operate under. We're trying to build an operating
> system; that necessitates adding APIs and features, for example
> network status change notification which is useful everywhere.
A server operating system needs to be more predictable than dynamic. How
does SNMP deal with these changes? It screws things up in general if an
SNMP index ever changes.
> It's perfectly fine though if someone's "create mediawiki appliance
> image" tool strips out stuff; but we should be moving the core OS to
> be more unified and featureful in general.
The server side of Linux has been fairly feature-complete for years and
is responsible for most Linux usage. Don't break that to get a desktop
that still might never be popular.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list