RFC: fix summary text for lots of packages

[Michal Hlavinka]

Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> 2008/11/21 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com>:
>   
>> I think that point is irrelevant as RPM Fusion follows the same
>> packaging guidelines as Fedora with a few legislation- and
>> license-related exceptions.
>>     
>
> I perfectly know that RPM Fusion follows almost the same guidelines. I
> was just pointing out that some of the package Richard was talking
> about are not in Fedora.
>   

This is also good point. What about third party packages?
For example:
java, acroread, flash-plugin, ...

They probably won't change their summary if it is too long.