RFC: fix summary text for lots of packages

[Till Maas]

On Fri November 21 2008, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 17:10 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Fri November 21 2008, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > > * System daemon that is a DBUS abstraction layer for package management
> > > (too verbose)
> >
> > I disagree that "Package management framework" would be a better summary
> > instead of above, because imho it is a useful information that it is a
> > daemon and uses DBUS.
>
> Right, framework just sounded a more complete word than daemon. Maybe
> "Package management service" might be a better name.

How about "DBUS-based package management service"?

> > Also all the differen summaries for media players above do not really
> > provide much information that allows to distinguish them, e.g. is the
> > gstreamer based media player or the player from Mozilla not feature rich
> > or customizable? I don't know, but the summary does not really help here.
>
> I don't think it matters; the user will click on it and read the
> description if they are that interested.

If one uses "yum search", then there is no easy clicking. Also it is imho a 
better user experience, if the different players are easier to distinguish 
with a GUI, if they all have more or less only the information "this is an 
media player", it would be probably better to only display a category summary 
for them on the GUI.

Regards,
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20081121/b0c41733/attachment.sig>