RFC: fix summary text for lots of packages

Toshio Kuratomi a.badger at gmail.com
Fri Nov 21 20:01:38 UTC 2008


Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Friday 21 November 2008, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> Naheem Zaffar wrote:
>>> Considering that the package name is not given much prominence in the
>>> UI, is it really a bad thing to repeat it in the summary?
>> Yes.
>>
>> As I understand it, the name is shown in the UI, [...]
> 
> Leaving gnome-packagekit's current UI aside, is repeating the package name in 
> summary something that people would rather not see done in any case?  I tend 
> to think that it'd be better to not repeat it myself.  Just asking in case 
> there's clear consensus on this - this is something that would be trivial to 
> check in rpmlint.
> 
+1

-Toshio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20081121/a2efb5fd/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list