RFC: fix summary text for lots of packages

[Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams]

On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 23:06 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri November 21 2008, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 20:11 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> > > How about "DBUS-based package management service"?
> >
> > Is the fact that it uses D-Bus *really* that important to an end user to
> > warrant putting it in the summary?
> 
> It is the only fact I know about it that makes it special. I do not really 
> know what it does, but as far as I understand it is like yum-cron, except 
> that it triggers an action not periodically but via an dbus-event, e.g. when 
> the yum metadata was refreshed or when the system got network access. But I 
> do not really know which package is it, but this is what I experienced on 
> live systems and it seems to match the description.

Then perhaps it's not special at all. Maybe it *shouldn't* really
"exist" in the end-user's mind outside of gnome-packagekit and/or
KPackageKit.

That's not to say that enterprising/adventurous users shouldn't look
closer, but that sometimes the distinctions just aren't all that
important.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com>

PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20081121/a1a37a85/attachment.sig>