orphaning gnome-volume-manager

Denis Leroy denis at poolshark.org
Tue Nov 25 16:08:43 UTC 2008


Seth Vidal wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> 
>> Patrice Dumas (pertusus at free.fr) said:
>>>> To an extent. We block packages every release that serve no purpose
>>>> any more.
>>>
>>> You should not, they should be orphaned.
>>
>> If a package's entire function has been subsumed by another package, 
>> there's
>> no point in going through an orphan cycle.
> 
> but it  should be obsoleted by _something_.

fedora-release ?

Although I agree with Patrice, it seems more natural to orphan it and 
let Darwin's law do its job...

-denis




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list