orphaning gnome-volume-manager
Denis Leroy
denis at poolshark.org
Tue Nov 25 16:08:43 UTC 2008
Seth Vidal wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
>> Patrice Dumas (pertusus at free.fr) said:
>>>> To an extent. We block packages every release that serve no purpose
>>>> any more.
>>>
>>> You should not, they should be orphaned.
>>
>> If a package's entire function has been subsumed by another package,
>> there's
>> no point in going through an orphan cycle.
>
> but it should be obsoleted by _something_.
fedora-release ?
Although I agree with Patrice, it seems more natural to orphan it and
let Darwin's law do its job...
-denis
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list