trash-cli : Looking for a reviewer

[Andrea Francia]

Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> Andrea Francia wrote:
>   
>> Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
>>     
>>> Jean-François Martin wrote:
>>>  
>>>       
>>>> Le dimanche 05 octobre 2008 à 01:36 +0200, Patrice Dumas a écrit :
>>>>    
>>>>         
>>>>> On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 01:10:06AM +0200, Jean-François Martin wrote:
>>>>>      
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Patrice Dumas had already done a partial review but don't want to
>>>>>> accept
>>>>>> the package because he think that executables are too generic (trash,
>>>>>> empty-trash, list-trash, restore-trash).
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>>> There is only trash that I find too generic...
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> If this command is really a problem can't we rename it "to-trash" for
>>>> example and add a file in doc, README.fedora that tell that for
>>>> packaging policy, we decide to change this command?
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> If renaming, please consider renaming them all to trash-* from the
>>> current
>>> *-trash.
>>>   
>>>       
>> What are the advantages of doing this?
>>     
>
> Eh, thought it's obvious.  One can type "trash" then use tab completion to see
> what commands are available.  
So the commands names could became:
 - trashcan-put
 - trashcan-empty
 - trashcan-list
 - trashcan-restore

My English is not so good, is the 'trashcan-put' a good choice?

-- 
Andrea Francia
http://andreafrancia.blogspot.com/2008/07/colinux-linux-dentro-windows.html